WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "fd9323a9-8e44-4da6-a443-d60073f86a54"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 12, "id": "31646", "owners": [12], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "31646"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:kumadai.repo.nii.ac.jp:00031646", "sets": ["647"]}, "author_link": ["155303"], "item_15_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2020-03", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "60", "bibliographicPageStart": "49", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "14", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "先端倫理研究"}, {"bibliographic_title": "Studies of advanced ethics", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_15_creator_3": {"attribute_name": "別言語の著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Tanaka, Tomohiro"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "155303", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_15_description_5": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Roy Forbes Harrod regards classical utilitarianism as crude utilitarianism. On the other hand, he refers to his own utilitarianism as refined utilitarianism. In this paper, the former is explored as act utilitarianism, and the latter as quasi-rule utilitarianism. The transition from act utilitarianism to rule utilitarianism is partly evident in Harrod\u0027s argument. He argues about the generalization of moral judgments by citing Immanuel Kant\u0027s categorical imperative. However,he altered Kant\u0027s concept of universality into generality without annotations and clearly identified universality with the generality of moral judgments. In this paper, the difference between Kant\u0027s perception that universality and generality are distinct and Harrod\u0027s perception that they are the same is explored. Findings of this study shows that Harrod\u0027s generality was the \"generality of the action\" to be considered, so it is applicable only to the part of the \"maxim of the action\" in Kant\u0027s categorical imperative. As in many conventional interpretations, the part of \"universal law\" is applicable to the \"universalization\" as a generalization of the concept of the subject.", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_15_publisher_36": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "熊本大学"}]}, "item_15_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "18807879", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_15_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA12213591", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_15_subject_20": {"attribute_name": "日本十進分類法", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "150", "subitem_subject_scheme": "NDC"}]}, "item_15_version_type_19": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "田中, 朋弘"}, {"creatorName": "タナカ, トモヒロ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "155303", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_access", "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "SR0014_49-60.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.9 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1900000.0, "url": {"url": "https://kumadai.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/31646/files/SR0014_49-60.pdf"}, "version_id": "ec48c539-865b-4668-a0ae-27357a984422"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Harrod\u0027s Universality and Generality in Ethical Norms", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Harrod\u0027s Universality and Generality in Ethical Norms", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "15", "owner": "12", "path": ["647", "966"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2298/00043301", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2020-05-20"}, "publish_date": "2020-05-20", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "31646", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Harrod\u0027s Universality and Generality in Ethical Norms"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
Harrod's Universality and Generality in Ethical Norms
http://hdl.handle.net/2298/00043301
http://hdl.handle.net/2298/00043301299c27c2-5253-49d8-95c6-e15f783149d6
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
SR0014_49-60.pdf (1.9 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2020-05-20 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | Harrod's Universality and Generality in Ethical Norms | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
田中, 朋弘
× 田中, 朋弘 |
|||||
別言語の著者 |
Tanaka, Tomohiro
× Tanaka, Tomohiro |
|||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述 | Roy Forbes Harrod regards classical utilitarianism as crude utilitarianism. On the other hand, he refers to his own utilitarianism as refined utilitarianism. In this paper, the former is explored as act utilitarianism, and the latter as quasi-rule utilitarianism. The transition from act utilitarianism to rule utilitarianism is partly evident in Harrod's argument. He argues about the generalization of moral judgments by citing Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative. However,he altered Kant's concept of universality into generality without annotations and clearly identified universality with the generality of moral judgments. In this paper, the difference between Kant's perception that universality and generality are distinct and Harrod's perception that they are the same is explored. Findings of this study shows that Harrod's generality was the "generality of the action" to be considered, so it is applicable only to the part of the "maxim of the action" in Kant's categorical imperative. As in many conventional interpretations, the part of "universal law" is applicable to the "universalization" as a generalization of the concept of the subject. | |||||
書誌情報 |
先端倫理研究 en : Studies of advanced ethics 巻 14, p. 49-60, 発行年 2020-03 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子 | 18807879 | |||||
NCID | ||||||
収録物識別子 | AA12213591 | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題 | 150 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 熊本大学 |