@article{oai:kumadai.repo.nii.ac.jp:00028773,
 author = {Watanabe, Shigeyoshi and Iino, Naoko and 飯野, 直子 and Fukushima, Kazuhiro and Kishigi, Keita and 島田, 秀昭 and Shimada, Hideaki and Murata, Takahiro and Masamoto, Kazumori and 正元, 和盛 and Tanabe, Tsutomu and Tanaka, Hitoshi and 宮縁, 育夫 and Miyabuchi, Yasuo and 渡邉, 重義 and Iino, Naoko and 飯野, 直子 and 福島, 和洋 and 岸木, 敬太 and 島田, 秀昭 and Shimada, Hideaki and 村田, 貴広 and Masamoto, Kazumori and 正元, 和盛 and 田辺, 力 and 田中, 均 and 宮縁, 育夫 and Miyabuchi, Yasuo},
 journal = {熊本大学教育学部紀要},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {application/pdf, 論文(Article), We analyzed the consultation contents of pupils and students (n=116) who participated in conference for supporting independent science inquiry in summer vacation. The consultation contents could be classified as follows; 1. Although the subject is clear and the study method has been planned, the participant needs the advice about the improvement of method (9.5%). 2. Although the subject is concrete, the participant couldn't think of the study method (50.0%). 3. Although the vague theme is set, the participant couldn't think of the subject and the study method (31.0%). 4. The participant couldn't set a study theme (9.5%).},
 pages = {375--382},
 title = {夏休み自由研究相談教室における児童・生徒の相談内容の分析},
 volume = {63},
 year = {2014},
 yomi = {イイノ, ナオコ and シマダ, ヒデアキ and マサモト, カズモリ and ミヤブチ, ヤスオ and イイノ, ナオコ and シマダ, ヒデアキ and マサモト, カズモリ and ミヤブチ, ヤスオ}
}