@article{oai:kumadai.repo.nii.ac.jp:00033887,
 author = {木嶋, 彩乃 and Kijima, Ayano and 大河内, 彩子 and Okouchi, Ayako},
 issue = {18},
 journal = {熊本大学医学部保健学科紀要},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {The purpose of this study is to organize the purpose of use and content structure of current assessment tools for child maltreatment in Japan. In addition, by examining the relationship with decision-making frameworks, the characteristics and trends are captured, and the assessment tools required in the future are discussed. Eight articles and seven manuals were selected as the target literature. Next, 27 assessment tools were selected from these. The assessment tools were classified based on similarities and differences in the purpose of use, and the timing and occasions of their use were checked. For the assessment items, we checked whether or not they corresponded to the four domains of the decision-making framework: " case factors," "external factors," "decision maker factors," and " organizational factors," and organized them in a table. The purposes of use were categorized into (I) "early detection of maltreatment risks," (II) "early detection and response to maltreatment," (Ⅲ) "prevention of recurrence of maltreatment and family reunification and (Ⅳ) "understanding and responding to the situation of those who need support". Assessment tools tended to be aimed at screening and risk assessment, and less at needs assessment. The period of use was perinatal in 11 cases, infancy in 21 cases, and school-age in 10 cases, with infancy being the most common. In terms of decision-making frameworks, case factors were included in the items of all assessment tools. On the other hand, items on organizational factors and decision-maker factors were rarely included. In the future, it is necessary to focus on needs assessment and assessment tools for decision-maker factors and organizational factors of supporters.},
 pages = {46--54},
 title = {日本における児童虐待のアセスメントツールの特徴に関する文献レビュー},
 year = {2022},
 yomi = {キジマ, アヤノ and オオコウチ, アヤコ}
}