@article{oai:kumadai.repo.nii.ac.jp:00034970,
 author = {山部, 順治 and Yamabe, Junji},
 journal = {人文科学論叢, Kumamoto journal of humanities},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {This article presents a varied picture in Odia of how two (or more) identically case-marked argument NPs (“same-case pair”) can and cannot occur in a sentence. Regarding this, three types of situations obtain in this language: in one type, which we will call “free occurrence”, a same-case pair can occur in immediate succession; in another type, “limited occurrence”, a same-case pair is allowed only if the NPs of the pair are linearly detached; and in still another type, “excluded occurrence”, a same-case pair is not allowed, irrespective of whether the NPs of the pair are adjacent to, or detached from, each other.
The distribution of these three situation types can be described in terms of two formal criteria: (i) the syntactic context in which a same-case pair is situated (roughly speaking, whether it is found in a simple clause or in a certain species of complex clause); (ii) the items constituting the same-case pair (whether the heads of the NPs of the pair are full nouns or pronouns; whether the case marker on the NP of the pair is an affix or a postposition). Viewed in totality, the distribution of the three situation types follows implicational hierarchies that are motivated by the following two criteria: (i) the more reduced structurally the syntactic context is, the more restrictive it is for the occurrence of same-case pair; (ii) the more perceptually prominent the case marker is, due to the features of constituent items, the more strictly restricted it is for the occurrence of same case pair.
The data reported for Odia in this article helps broaden and elaborate the descriptive and theoretical research space of Case OCP phenomena.},
 pages = {21--41},
 title = {Variation of Case OCP Effects in Odia},
 volume = {4},
 year = {2023},
 yomi = {ヤマベ, ジュンジ}
}